The Stanley Sweetheart No. 62 sits in BIFL purgatory — could've been great, but crippled by quality control roulette.
- •Build quality lottery: Users report everything from near-perfect tools to units with blade beds off by 20+ thousandths of an inch, loose handles that won't tighten, and non-flat soles. One reviewer nailed it: for sheer bang for my buck it's wonderful, while another had to return theirs for an unusable loose handle.
- •Core components shine: The thick A2 steel blade takes and holds a sharp edge very well, and the heavy casting provides stability. When you get a good one, it performs like a plane costing 3x more — taking gossamer shavings and handling gnarly grain with minimal tear-out.
- •Long-term concerns: The japanning is just paint that flakes off easily, spare blades are nearly impossible to source from Stanley (huge red flag for a jack plane), and the Norris adjuster has excessive backlash requiring several full rotations to retract the blade.
Bottom line: At $200+, this is a gamble — you might get a lifetime tool that needs minor tuning, or expensive junk requiring immediate return. The community is split because Stanley's inconsistent manufacturing turns what should be a solid mid-tier option into a risky purchase. Save for a Lie-Nielsen if you want guaranteed quality, or roll the dice if you're comfortable with potential hassle.